Opinions
& Counseling
BSKB helps clients develop a proactive intellectual property strategy that drives value. We provide legal insight as part of clients’ product and business model design efforts, and can provide opinions to assist with strategic decision-making. BSKB’s experienced attorneys are able to provide detailed opinions regarding freedom-to-operate, validity, infringement, and many other topics. The depth and breadth of our technical expertise ensures that our clients work with an attorney who is thoroughly versed in the technology at hand.
Attorneys and Professionals
Insights
-
June 22, 2021
Industry Reacts to the Supreme Court’s Arthrex Ruling: Chaos Averted – or Just Delayed?
IPWatchdog
Partner, Eugene T. Perez was recently quoted in an article by IPWatchdog regarding this week's U.S. Supreme Court patent decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc. Et Al.
-
April 16, 2021
Substitute/Cultivated Meat Technology: A Deep-Dive Patent Landscape Analysis
Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP
Substitute/Cultivated Meat Technology: A Deep-Dive Patent Landscape Analysis by Leonard R. Svensson, Esq.
Related Presentations
-
June 9, 2021
Raytheon Technologies Corporation v. General Electric Company (Fed. Cir. 2021)
-
May 26, 2021
Trimble Inc., Innovative Software Engineering, LLC, v. PerDiemCo LLC Case
-
April 21, 2021
A Review of USPTO Pilot Programs and Initiatives
-
April 7, 2021
IBSA Institut Biochimique, S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2020)
Recent News
-
January 1, 2022
Seth S. Kim Promoted to Partner
BSKB is pleased to announce that Seth S. Kim has been promoted to Partner of the firm.
-
November 24, 2021
USPTO DOCX Filings Surcharge Fee Delay
The USPTO has delayed the effective date of the surcharge fee for non-DOCX filings to January 1, 2023. The PTO Announcement and Federal Register Notice can be viewed using the USPTO link found here: https://www.uspto.gov/blog/director/entry/modernizing-patent-filing-with-docx The USPTO will continue to accept DOCX specifications for non-PCT applications first filed in the U.S., for applications filed in the U.S. under the Paris Convention and for applications filed as a by-pass continuation of a PCT application without the surcharge fee. The surcharge delay allows the USPTO time for further testing and for application filers to adjust to the DOCX format. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.