|
Publications
> BSKB Case
Briefs > Vol.
4 BSKB Case Briefs
Editors: Marc
S. Weiner, Esq., D. Richard Anderson, Esq., MaryAnne Armstrong, Ph.D., Esq.,
and Nicholas P. Godici.
::
Vol. 4, No. 11 (1
December 2006)
::
States Do Not Waive Their Sovereign
Immunity Rights In all Federal Districts When They File a Patent
Infringement Suit In District Court Tegic Communs.
Corp. v. Bd. of Regents,
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20475 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
::
Juries
can Consider Use of Patent Holder’s Former Employee in Proving Copying
and Discount Non-Infringement Opinions if Information is Intentionally
Withheld From Counsel.
LIQUID DYNAMICS CORP. V. VAUGHAN COMPANY, INC., No.
05-1105,-1325,-1366,-1399 (Fed. Cir. June 1, 2006)
::
Vol. 4, No. 10 (14 September 2006)
::
The CAFC Rules That There is No Right to a Jury Trial of an Inequitable
Conduct Charge
AGFA
Corporation v. Creo Products Inc., No. 05 1079 (Fed. Cir. June 26, 2006)
::
Vol. 4, No.
9 (5 September 2006)
::
A violation of 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, renders a patent
invalid even if the violation would have been merely objected to by the
USPTO, Pfizer Inc. v. Ranbaxy Labs, No.
06-1179, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19416 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
::
Vol. 4, No.
8 (1 August 2006)
::
Design Patent Infringement Requires Analysis of the Design as a Whole,
AMINI INNOVATION CORP. v.
ANTHONY CALIFORNIA, INC.,
No. 05-1159 (Fed. Cir.,
March 3, 2006).
::
The U.S. Supreme Court Rules that a Patent Does Not Necessarily Indicate
Market Power,
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC.
V. INDEPENDENT INK, INC.,
No. 04-1329 (U.S. March 1, 2006).
::
Vol. 4, No.
7 (25 July 2006)
:: The
CAFC Overrules the District Court Grant of a Preliminary Injunction, ABBOTT LABORATORIES V. TEVA
PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., No. 05-1433 (Fed Cir June 22, 2006).
::
Vol. 4, No. 6 (13 June 2006)
::
CAFC Denies Infringement Claim Against the U.S. Government When Some Steps
of the Process are Performed Outside the U.S.; U.S. Government Cannot be
Sued for a Taking for the Use of a Patented Invention,
ZOLTEK CORP. v. UNITED STATES,
No. 04-5100, -5102 (Fed Cir. March 31, 2006).
:: Cancelled Subject Matter in a Foreign Patent Application may be “printed
publications” under 35 U.S.C. 102(b), Bruckelmyer v. Ground
Heaters, Inc., No. 05-1412, 455 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. April 20, 2006).
::
Vol. 4., No. 5 (26 May 2006)
::
The Supreme Court Rules that Injunctive Relief is not "Automatic" in Patent
Cases,
eBay Inc., et al. v. Mercexchange, L.L.C.,
No. 05-130, 2006 WL 1310670 (U.S. May 15, 2006).
::
Vol. 4., No. 4 (23 May 2006)
::
The CAFC Affirms a
Rejection Based on a Combination of Four Prior Art References,
In re Leonard R. Kahn,
No. 04-1616 (Fed. Cir. March 22, 2006).
::
Anticipatory Prior Art Reference Does Not Have to be Enabled,
Rasmusson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.,
No. 04-1191,-1192, 75 USPQ2d 1297 (Fed. Cir.
June 27, 2005)
::
Vol. 4., No. 3 (9 March 2006)
::
CAFC Clarifies Materiality Standard
for Inequitable Conduct, Digital Control, Inc. v. Charles Machine
Works, No. 05-1128 (Fed Cir.,
February 8, 2006).
::
Vol. 4., No. 2 (21 February 2006)
::
Claim Directed to Multiple Statutory Classes Indefinite,
IPXL Holding, L.L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc.,
No. 05-1009,-1487 (Fed Cir., November 21, 2005).
::
Claim Construction and Prosecution History Scrutinized
in Infringement Case, RON NYSTROM v. TREX Company, Inc. &
TREX Company LLC, No.
03-1092 (Fed Cir.,
September 14, 2005).
::
Vol. 4, No. 1 (13 February 2006)
::
Determination of Invalidity for Generic
Software-Related Claim Based on the Written Description,
LizardTech, Inc. and Regents of the University of California v.
Earth Resource Mapping Inc. and Earth Resource Mapping PTY LTD,
No. 05-1062 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2005).
::
Activities to Directly Infringe on
U.S. Patent Must Occur in the U.S.,
MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. v
SUMITOMO MITSUBISHI SILICON CORP. (SUMCO),
No. 04-1396, -1513 (Fed.
Cir., August 22, 2005).
::
|
|
